JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 31, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Luis Antonio Casas Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó inaplicar el numeral 2º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por inconstitucional.

En consecuencia, se dirimió la colisión de competencias suscitada entre el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria y la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Civil en el sentido de determinar que la competencia para tramitar la tutela instaurada por el ciudadano de la referencia le corresponde al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. INAPLICAR, por inconstitucional, el numeral 2º del artículo 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000. En consecuencia. DECIDIR la colisión de competencias suscitada entre el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria y la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Civil en el sentido de determinar que la competencia para tramitar la tutela instaurada por Luis Antonio Casas López le corresponde al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria.
  2. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.